T. E. Lawrence Correspondence – Page 626
T. E. Lawrence Correspondence
Page 626
Po E.M. Inces, Cambridge
My ..."s (It is deleted) opinion
330171 .CB Shew
not 108
R.A.F. cadet college
Cranwell
Lincs.
14.3.23
Of course it has to be answered; but not easily.
I told E.M.F. a week before that your opinion of my book
would be important, since you were the best critic just
now writing. Then your "Authors" came, & confirmed
what, after all, was a lucky judgement, since I don't often
see the weekly papers. I meant to write to you about
your book, comparing your promising plantation of ...
trees with my ... national-rep of second-hand materials...
and the next step is your finding my thing good!
It puzzles me, and shakes my conviction that it is
rotten: of course I'll come back to my own position,
afterwards, when the shock of your judgement has died past.
Surely you can see that the effective scenes in the book
are made effective by walking "Cricket" I always had the
ambition to write something good, & when the Revolt gave
me a subject I tried to make up for what I felt - a
lack of instinct, by taking innumerable pains: by studying
how other people got their effects, & using their experience.
So I built an enormous mass of second-hand ..."ts into
my skeleton ... and completely hid the skeleton under them.
At least I think I spoiled it, though I notice you detect
a certain unity, where S.S. found a lack of his "architectonics".
It sounds very conceited, that I should go on believing
the book rotten, when you have written in the contrary sense.
S.S. also called it epical (though an epic hasn't yet been
built on the ...ngs, as aside from the ... of men)!
and I've lived down his praise. So there isn't much hope
for your downing me. Yet I admit it is a proof. All the
harder because I was sure that your classical spirit would
condemn me outright. It is also awfully good of ... to
have written at such length.
Other people have identified me with the Arab ...som
of body and soul: It isn't, I think, really my position,
& I've put in a new preface in the new edition, trying to
make it clear. However that is at the printers, just now.
You shall have the extract later. "Expurging syllables"
Why, I've cut out 50,000 words for this new edition, which
is to be the complete edition. The text you have seen is
to be destroyed, when the new one is ready. Don't go & tell
me, when the new one rolls up, that I've gone & spoilt it.
Editor's Note: This text has been transcribed automatically and likely has errors. if you would like to contribute by submitting a corrected transcription.